[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [EXT] RE: [cti] Working Call Agenda For Next Week
Great questions and thanks for bringing it up. I do not know the answer. If it was one that was missed, then we should talk about it.
Please everyone review that list of relationships from the excel sheet I sent out in detail.
From: Lenk, Chris <email@example.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2019 2:28:38 PM
To: Bret Jordan; firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: [EXT] RE: [cti] Working Call Agenda For Next Week
Regarding the SCO Relationships I notice that ‘belongs_to_ref’ will be made an external relationship for most of the SCOs that have it, but not for the Email Address Object. Is there a reason for this? What were the criteria used to determine which relationships would stay embedded vs be made external? Apologies if I’m missing something obvious or it has already been stated.
As we work towards Milestone 2, there are a few things we need to resolve and get final clarity on. Some of these topics will unfortunately be somewhat contentious. In fact, there will be people on both sides that "_strongly_" disagree. So while I understand we will not get unanimity, we need to get general consensus to move forward. So it is important that we hear concrete use-cases in simple and easy to understand terms. We also need to respect that just because there is a use case, that does not mean the TC will agree to do it at this time. So please, everyone!, be patient, calm, and let us work through these last few things.
Topics for the working call:
Please come prepared to discuss these issues.