[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti] Re: [EXT] Re: [cti] STIX 2.1 CSD02 Sponsorship?
Hi Ivan â not exactly sure what you mean by âtypeâ of sponsorship.
Do you mean more examples that we want for SCO sponsorship verification?
Maybe we can add this discussion topic to the next weekly meeting.
That makes sense to me, Allan. Any other thoughts as to the âtypeâ of sponsorship for the below items?
Ivan â I would suggest that the user of SCO as top-level objects just needs to be conceptually verified.
A couple of real-world examples might suffice.
Those 2 examples might be good enough.
Now that STIX 2.1 CSD02 is out the door, we can begin the sponsorship process. However, one of the questions that we (MITRE/DHS) have is with regards to the âtypeâ of sponsorship expected for each item â âfullâ (code + interop text) or just working code. If you recall from the last sponsorship period, certain things like confidence only required working code while others such as the Opinion & Note objects required interop text as well.
Hereâs the list of items for sponsorship, along with my own thoughts as to the type of sponsorship:
Also, I would suggest that we donât formally start the sponsorship period until we get this question resolved, so that sponsors have a better understanding of what is expected.