OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

cti message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [EXT] [cti] [EXT] Re: [cti] TAXII Pagination Example Text


The data is collected in bulk from the other sources. We could indeed
attach a timestamp to the bulk collection, but that would be the same
for all data collected in one shot exceeding any sane pagination limits.

I am somewhat confused that we're back at the data storage question
though, TAXII/STIX should NOT have inherent needs when it comes to how
data is stored as from what I understood it's purely a
transport/exchange format / protocol. If TAXII basically requires us to
move all the stored data to true micro second precision (instead of
padding it on fetch for lower precision tools), then that will kill a
lot of interactions with other tools out there.

Best regards,
Andras

On 09.09.19 17:07, Bret Jordan wrote:
> So if you are building a streaming collector that gathers data from other sensors, you have control over how that data gets added / stored on that intermediary streaming server.  Since you may need to paginate the data, you must be definition then need to temporarily store that data.  If you need to store data, then you can define what ever data structures you want.  Thus you can define the date added property with microsecond precision.   Keep in mind that the data added is NOT the date that the end / origin sensor used for its timestamp. 
> 
> I just do not see how this is broken or why it would not work. Please help meâ
> 
> Bret


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]