OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

cti message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [cti] Comment Resolution Log for STIX 2.1 CSD 05


I second this motion.
 
Thanks, Bret!
 
Emily Ratliff
STSM, Security Architect
IBM Security
 
 
----- Original message -----
From: Bret Jordan <bret.jordan@broadcom.com>
Sent by: <cti@lists.oasis-open.org>
To: Emily Ratliff <Emily.Ratliff@ibm.com>
Cc: OASIS CTI TC Discussion List <cti@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cti] Comment Resolution Log for STIX 2.1 CSD 05
Date: Fri, Jan 15, 2021 11:17 AM
 
I have not seen or heard anyone say anything else about this.
 
So I move that the TC accept these changes and produce a new version of STIX 2.1 that includes these non-material changes that came in via public review and open a ballot to approve this new version with non-material changes as a Committee Specification (CS). 
 
Thanks,
Bret
PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447  F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050
"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg."
 
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 1:21 PM Emily Ratliff <Emily.Ratliff@ibm.com> wrote:
Happy New Year!
 
Thanks to everyone who voted on CSD05, it passed and the public review period is now complete. We received 3 comments during that time. The proposed comment resolution log is attached.
 
The comments included
- a question about avoiding duplicates which was answered on the list (Thanks to Rich and Keven!) and requires no spec change
- identification of an editorial problem with the Identity Class open vocabulary table (unspecified in the summary, unknown in the body)
- request to add an optional pointer to a human readable comment about the extension
 
Are you willing to accept the resolution (accept) of the latter two since they are simple editorial fixes and clarifications? These changes are simple and straightforward enough that Bret nor I believe that a working group call is needed, but we wanted to make sure that you agree with the changes and are in agreement with this plan. Please let us know.
 
Thank you!
 
Emily Ratliff
STSM, Security Architect
IBM Security


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

This electronic communication and the information and any files transmitted with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, legally privileged, protected by privacy laws, or otherwise restricted from disclosure to anyone else. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, copying, distributing, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please return the e-mail to the sender, delete it from your computer, and destroy any printed copy of it.
 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]