RE: [cti] STIX WG - Please review object signing proposal

Hi Bret,

Are you able to join us next week to discuss your concerns and hear the rationale for the differences?

Emily

From: Bret Jordan <bj@ctin.us>
Date: Wednesday, March 2, 2022 at 10:12 AM
To: Emily Ratliff <Emily.Ratliff@ibm.com>
Cc: "cti@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cti] STIX WG - Please review object signing proposal

HI Emily, I would like to see a diff of this proposal from the proposal I submitted to this TC based on what CACAO did. From what I can tell, JMG just tweaked my original content. So a diff would be very helpful since the CACAO version is already ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart

This Message Is From an External Sender

This message came from outside your organization.

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
HI Emily,

I would like to see a diff of this proposal from the proposal I submitted to this TC based on what CACAO did. From what I can tell, JMG just tweaked my original content. So a diff would be very helpful since the CACAO version is already being used in the wild. Reinventing the wheel is never a good idea and diminishes the value of OASIS as whole.

Bret

On Mar 1, 2022, at 5:21 PM, Emily Ratliff <Emily.Ratliff@ibm.com> wrote:

Hi STIX WG,

John-Mark sent out his proposal for JSON Signing last week. I got some reports that some people did not receive his email. For next weekâs meeting, please review the proposal here:

https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=69653&wg_abbrev=cti

and come prepared to discuss.

Thanks!

Emily

cti message