OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

cti message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [cti] STIX WG - Please review object signing proposal


We will try to get a list of differences out to you. A mechanical diff wonât work in this case, so we will create a high level overview. Please be aware that this is coming forward as an extension object, not as an update to the specification at this time.

 

Emily

 

From: aa tt <atcyber1000@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, March 2, 2022 at 10:34 AM
To: Emily Ratliff <Emily.Ratliff@ibm.com>
Cc: Bret Jordan <bj@ctin.us>, "cti@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cti] STIX WG - Please review object signing proposal

 

Iâm unable to attend such a meeting (due to many conflicts) but I would also ask the team provide a delta presentation or doc and help provide insight/why a delta needs to exist. I generally agree that coming up with 2 solutions for digital ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart

This Message Is From an External Sender

This message came from outside your organization.

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Iâm unable to attend such a meeting (due to many conflicts) but I would also ask the team provide a delta presentation or doc and help provide insight/why a delta needs to exist.

 

I generally agree that coming up with 2 solutions for digital signing on STIX/CACAO (fundamentally JSON) makes no sense and will likely undermine the whole objective.

 

Would it be possible for someone to provide a summary on the differences? Any insight on pro/con on what the delta does would also help.

 

Iâm very familiar with the CACAO (fundamentally its just JSON) signing. So it would help me understand better if such a delta existed.

 

Allan

 



On Mar 2, 2022, at 8:27 AM, Emily Ratliff <Emily.Ratliff@ibm.com> wrote:

 

Hi Bret,

 

Are you able to join us next week to discuss your concerns and hear the rationale for the differences?

 

Emily

 

From: Bret Jordan <bj@ctin.us>
Date: Wednesday, March 2, 2022 at 10:12 AM
To: Emily Ratliff <Emily.Ratliff@ibm.com>
Cc: "cti@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cti] STIX WG - Please review object signing proposal

 

HI Emily, I would like to see a diff of this proposal from the proposal I submitted to this TC based on what CACAO did. From what I can tell, JMG just tweaked my original content. So a diff would be very helpful since the CACAO version is already ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart

This Message Is From an External Sender

This message came from outside your organization.

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
HI Emily,

 

I would like to see a diff of this proposal from the proposal I submitted to this TC based on what CACAO did. From what I can tell, JMG just tweaked my original content. So a diff would be very helpful since the CACAO version is already being used in the wild. Reinventing the wheel is never a good idea and diminishes the value of OASIS as whole. 

 

Bret




On Mar 1, 2022, at 5:21 PM, Emily Ratliff <Emily.Ratliff@ibm.com> wrote:

 

Hi STIX WG,

 

John-Mark sent out his proposal for JSON Signing last week. I got some reports that some people did not receive his email. For next weekâs meeting, please review the proposal here:

 

 

and come prepared to discuss.

 

Thanks!

 

Emily

 

 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]