RE: [dcml-frame] REMINDER: Comments on the DCML charter due by EOB Tomorrow

["Robin Basham" <robinbasham@rcn.com>]

I agree.  I have a model for the combination of frameworks that I will show
the group at next session.  I don't see a reason to hold up the charter.
robin

-----Original Message-----
From: Cummins, Fred A [mailto:fred.cummins@eds.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 1:48 PM
To: Robin Basham
Subject: RE: [dcml-frame] REMINDER: Comments on the DCML charter due by EOB
Tomorrow

Robin,

I'm not sure what this means.  If you mean the date must
have well-defined and consistent semantics, I'm okay with
that.  I'm not sure what the multiple frameworks and 
standards are--that is pretty broad.  If you mean that
all DCML records/messages must be consistent with the
data model, I'm okay with that, but it needs to be
stated less ambiguously ;-) 

Fred 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Robin Basham [mailto:robinbasham@rcn.com] 
>Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 1:03 PM
>To: Cummins, Fred A
>Cc: dcml-appserv@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: RE: [dcml-frame] REMINDER: Comments on the DCML 
>charter due by EOB Tomorrow
>
>On that note,
>I wanted to see a high level statement including:
>
>Ontology for the uniform representation of any framework or 
>standard with result that an organization can align to 
>multiple frameworks and standards as required by their 
>industry and core department function.
>
>I'm not entirely sure if this is my mission, or the group mission.
>
>I wrote about this in the www.pbandsp.com/PMMR paper.  The 
>footnotes and comments deal with my thoughts on the subject.
>
>Regarding Sarah's comment on the share IP, this is an area of 
>tremendous concern for me.
>
>Regarding the proposal from Jamie, I mentioned in the meeting 
>that the changes felt appropriate to me.  I don't want my 
>views to hold up progress.
>I don't feel we should alter the presentation of the charter.
> 
>
>Robin
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Cummins, Fred A [mailto:fred.cummins@eds.com]
>Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 12:52 PM
>To: Sarah Barbuscia; dcml-frame@lists.oasis-open.org
>Cc: jamie.clark@oasis-open.org
>Subject: RE: [dcml-frame] REMINDER: Comments on the DCML 
>charter due by EOB Tomorrow
>
>Sarah,
>
>The charter looks generally okay, but
>
>- the Statement of Purpose talks about a "data model" and the 
>deliverables talks about a "taxonomy."  It should be a data 
>model, and, furthermore, it should be based on CIM or we 
>should know why not.  This provides consistency among the real 
>deliverable(s) of this effort and others.
>
>- the "real" deliverables should be the XML document 
>specifications for communication of configuration 
>transactions, i.e., what documents are exchanged to support 
>configuration management processes. 
>
>Fred
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Sarah Barbuscia [mailto:SBarbuscia@inventures.com]
>>Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 6:45 PM
>>To: dcml-frame@lists.oasis-open.org
>>Cc: jamie.clark@oasis-open.org
>>Subject: [dcml-frame] REMINDER: Comments on the DCML charter 
>due by EOB 
>>Tomorrow
>>
>> 
>>Reminder: 
>>
>>As discussed on Tuesday's teleconference, any comments on the TC 
>>charter are due to the mail list by EOD tomorrow, February 10, 2006.
>>
>>Sarah
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: James Bryce Clark [mailto:jamie.clark@oasis-open.org]
>>Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 5:28 PM
>>To: dcml-frame@lists.oasis-open.org
>>Subject: [dcml-frame] Proposed text of charter clarification ballot
>>
>>     Would you please review the attached revisions that I've 
>received 
>>as
>>proposed amendments to the DCML Framework TC charter.   
>(There are two 
>>identical documents attached here, in two formats, each 
>marked to show 
>>changes from the current approved text.)   Among other things,
>>     -- As you've discussed,  these would rename the TC as the "DCML 
>>Configuration Management TC."
>>     -- These changes anticipate the practical equivalent of merging 
>>the Apps & Services TC into this one.
>>     -- New target dates should be inserted for the proposed 
>clarified 
>>list of deliverables.
>>
>>     If adopted this would qualify as a "charter clarification" under 
>>the OASIS TC Process.  We can launch the ballot (as a web 
>ballot on the 
>>TC's
>>site) to approve it as soon as the new target dates are 
>filled in, and 
>>we incorporate any consensual corrections to the proposal.
>>     Best regards  JBC
>>
>>~   James Bryce Clark
>>~   Director, Standards Development, OASIS
>>~   jamie.clark@oasis-open.org 
>>
>>
>