[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dcml-frame] Re: Meeting times
Tim, et al, In our discussion today, there were concerns about getting greater participation in this effort. I expressed a view that the current framework and approach appear to be quite abstract and removed from having a meaningful impact on products and purchasers. As a result, there may not be business cases for investing in this effort as there is no imminent threat or window of opportunity. The approach of starting with an ontology seems to me to reinforce this perception. An ontology for the data center or information services domain could take forever. The ontology, per se, will not solve the problem of achieving interoperability between particular tools. That will require well-defined and explicit specifications of XML schema. While an ontology can help ensure the consistency of specifications across a substantial domain, the ontology must be a means to an end, where the end is a set of XML schema that achieve interoperability between tools for various purposes. While an ontology may support some sophisticated forms of inference and analysis, much of what is needed today is much more mundane. Also, the purpose of the standard should not be to support implementations of tools, but rather to enable tools to talk to each other and at the same time enable vendors to differentiate their products with implementations that provide desirable capabilities. I suggest that the ontology be viewed as the mechanism for ensuring that we speak the same langauge, but that the focus of attention turn to defining XML schema for exchange of data for particular purposes. The ontology can help ensure that the concepts and relationships are consistent across multiple schema. The development of the ontology should be driven by efforts to solve particular problems. The XML schema should be specific views (a.k.a, abstractions) of the ontology. We need to be working on a spec that will impact the marketplace within the next year--a solution to a specific business problem. That will spark market interest and prime the pump to get involvement in longer term efforts. Fred Cummins EDS > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Howes [mailto:howes@opsware.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 12:06 AM > To: dcml-frame@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [dcml-frame] Re: Meeting times > > > Hi folks. Here's the dial-in info for tomorrow's call: > > Dial-in: (888) 772-1825 > Passcode: 4087447509 > > Agenda: > > - Intro and roll call > - Framework draft discussion > - Use cases discussion > - Momentum discussion > - Any other business > > See you tomorrow, 9am pacific time. -- Tim > > Tim Howes wrote: > > The votes are in, and it looks like we have a winner: > > > > Alternate Tuesdays from 9-10am PST > > > > We will start next Tuesday 1/18. I will send out dial-in > > info and an agenda when I have it (should be soon). If > > there are agenda topics anybody would like to cover, > > please let me know. Thanks! -- Tim > > > > Tim Howes wrote: > > > >> Ok, well, so much for that. Turns out none of those > >> times worked well for people, though if we had to > >> choose one it would be Wednesday. Friday is not a > >> work day everywhere, and Monday conflicts with some > >> other DCML meetings. > >> > >> How about either of these: > >> > >> Thursday 9-10am PST > >> Tuesday 9-10am PST > >> > >> Please reply and let me know if these times do NOT > >> work for you. Thanks! -- Tim > >> > >> Tim Howes wrote: > >> > >>> Hi again. The times below are US pacific time. > >>> So far, Monday's looking best, though some trouble > >>> for people making it on the 10th. Please let me > >>> know. Thanks -- Tim > >>> > >>> Tim Howes wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi all. The new year is here, and that can mean > >>>> only one thing: time to get serious about DCML! > >>>> > >>>> I'd like to propose that the framework group > >>>> hold a regular bi-weekly conference call to > >>>> ensure we make regular progress on all our goals > >>>> and remove any roadblocks that come up as soon > >>>> as possible. Here are three regular times that > >>>> work for me. Please let me know ASAP only if > >>>> you have a strong preference and any of these > >>>> times do NOT work for you. I'll try to pick the > >>>> time that causes the least amount of trouble for > >>>> people. > >>>> > >>>> MON (1/10, 1/24, ...) - 10:30 - 11:30 a.m. > >>>> WED (1/12, 1/26, ...) - 9:00 - 10:00 a.m. > >>>> FRI (1/14, 1/28, ...) - 11:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. > >>>> > >>>> If all goes well, we'll start next week, so > >>>> please let me know by tomorrow. Thanks! > >>>> -- Tim > >>>> > >>> > >> > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]