RE: [dcml-appserv] RE: [dcml-frame] REMINDER: Comments on the DCML charter due by EOB Tomorrow

["Thomas, Darrel" <darrel.thomas@eds.com>]

We'd better get these comments into the purview of the Framework group
as well, to be sure we all agree before we put to vote.  I'm still
unsure if we don't create scope creep at this point with the vision of
multiple framework mapping, even though I know what Robin means.  We
should mean that DCML can evolve along the evolutionary lines of Process
Frameworks, so as to not limit its effectiveness when the next one comes
along.  However, immediately we should set goals along immediate
framework comprehension as it makes sense in the IT Services Management
domains...

Make sense?

jDT

-----Original Message-----
From: Robin Basham [mailto:robinbasham@rcn.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 12:03 PM
To: Cummins, Fred A
Cc: dcml-appserv@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [dcml-appserv] RE: [dcml-frame] REMINDER: Comments on the DCML
charter due by EOB Tomorrow

On that note,
I wanted to see a high level statement including:

Ontology for the uniform representation of any framework or standard
with
result that an organization can align to multiple frameworks and
standards
as required by their industry and core department function.

I'm not entirely sure if this is my mission, or the group mission.

I wrote about this in the www.pbandsp.com/PMMR paper.  The footnotes and
comments deal with my thoughts on the subject.

Regarding Sarah's comment on the share IP, this is an area of tremendous
concern for me.

Regarding the proposal from Jamie, I mentioned in the meeting that the
changes felt appropriate to me.  I don't want my views to hold up
progress.
I don't feel we should alter the presentation of the charter.
 

Robin

-----Original Message-----
From: Cummins, Fred A [mailto:fred.cummins@eds.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 12:52 PM
To: Sarah Barbuscia; dcml-frame@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: jamie.clark@oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [dcml-frame] REMINDER: Comments on the DCML charter due by
EOB
Tomorrow

Sarah,

The charter looks generally okay, but

- the Statement of Purpose talks about a "data model" and the
deliverables talks about a "taxonomy."  It should be a data
model, and, furthermore, it should be based on CIM or we
should know why not.  This provides consistency among the
real deliverable(s) of this effort and others.

- the "real" deliverables should be the XML document specifications
for communication of configuration transactions, i.e., what
documents are exchanged to support configuration management
processes. 

Fred

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sarah Barbuscia [mailto:SBarbuscia@inventures.com] 
>Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 6:45 PM
>To: dcml-frame@lists.oasis-open.org
>Cc: jamie.clark@oasis-open.org
>Subject: [dcml-frame] REMINDER: Comments on the DCML charter 
>due by EOB Tomorrow
>
> 
>Reminder: 
>
>As discussed on Tuesday's teleconference, any comments on the 
>TC charter are due to the mail list by EOD tomorrow, February 
>10, 2006. 
>
>Sarah 
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: James Bryce Clark [mailto:jamie.clark@oasis-open.org]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 5:28 PM
>To: dcml-frame@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: [dcml-frame] Proposed text of charter clarification ballot
>
>     Would you please review the attached revisions that I've 
>received as 
>proposed amendments to the DCML Framework TC charter.   (There are two 
>identical documents attached here, in two formats, each marked to show 
>changes from the current approved text.)   Among other things,
>     -- As you've discussed,  these would rename the TC as the 
>"DCML Configuration Management TC."
>     -- These changes anticipate the practical equivalent of 
>merging the Apps & Services TC into this one.
>     -- New target dates should be inserted for the proposed 
>clarified list of deliverables.
>
>     If adopted this would qualify as a "charter 
>clarification" under the OASIS TC Process.  We can launch the 
>ballot (as a web ballot on the TC's
>site) to approve it as soon as the new target dates are filled 
>in, and we incorporate any consensual corrections to the proposal.
>     Best regards  JBC
>
>~   James Bryce Clark
>~   Director, Standards Development, OASIS
>~   jamie.clark@oasis-open.org 
>
>