Re: [dita-adoption-fasc] Fwd: [dita-users] Re: xref requirements

["David J. B. Hollis" <dhollis@AandOConsultancy.ltd.uk>]

Dear Carol

This issue is now more than a month old, so I'm sure it's all been  
resolved.

Would it be possible to have an update for the DITA Adoption FASC,  
please? Were any issues identified? Are there any lessons to be learnt?

Many thanks,
David


> Debbie,
> We are terribly sorry you've had problems with DITA XML.org. We're  
> working
> to fix it now.
>
> Can you help us clarify what actually occurred? There seem to be  
> comments
> from you at
> http://dita.xml.org/forum/requirements-thread-xref
>
> Was there a delay in posting those or did you create others that were
> rejected or did you get a message after posting those that indicated  
> they
> were rejected?
>
> Thanks,
> Carol
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David J. B. Hollis [mailto:dhollis@AandOConsultancy.ltd.uk]
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 2:25 AM
> To: DITA Adoption Focus Area SC
> Subject: [dita-adoption-fasc] Fwd: [dita-users] Re: xref requirements
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: "Deborah Pickett" <debbiep-list-ditausers@futzle.com>
>> Date: 27 February 2009 03:56:49 GMT
>> To: dita-users@yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: [dita-users] Re: xref requirements
>> Reply-To: dita-users@yahoogroups.com
>>
>>>> http://dita.xml.org/forum/requirements-thread-xref
>>
>> Forget it . . . In two attempts I've had two long, carefully worded,
>> messages eaten by dita.xml.org's spam filter.  I can't afford to  
>> waste
>> that kind of time when I can't even be sure that my comments are  
>> going
>> to be seen.
>>
>> I will happily continue the discussion here on dita-users, but
>> dita.xml.org can go filter itself into oblivion.