RE: [dita-adoption] Groups - DITA 1.2 Feature Overview: Referencing a Range of Elements (feature-description-referencing-a-range-of-elements.doc) uploaded

["Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: joeg@suite-sol.com [mailto:joeg@suite-sol.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 2009 July 21 13:27
> To: dita-adoption@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [dita-adoption] Groups - DITA 1.2 Feature Overview: Referencing a
> Range of Elements (feature-description-referencing-a-range-of-elements.doc)
> uploaded
> 
> All feedback is welcome...
> 
>  -- Mr. Joe Gelb
> 
> The document named DITA 1.2 Feature Overview: Referencing a Range of
> Elements (feature-description-referencing-a-range-of-elements.doc) has been
> submitted by Mr. Joe Gelb to the OASIS DITA Adoption TC document
> repository.
> 
> Document Description:
> This feature overview describes how a component reference (conref) can be
> made to a range of adjacent (sibling) elements.
> 
> View Document Details:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=33473
> 
> Download Document:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/33473/feature-description-
> referencing-a-range-of-elements.doc

Looks generally good to me.

I believe conref is short for content reference, not component reference.

The second sentence of the Purpose has an unbalanced parenthesis.

Under Restrictions, there are several mentions of "be generalized down 
to the same type"; instead, it should say "be generalizable to the 
same type" (or some more grammatical equivalent).

Just for greater clarity, I'd augment the first sentence of Example 3 
with a phrase such as:

 and are themselves both the same element type as (or generalizable to)
 the referencing element. 

paul