[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita-adoption] FW: [dita] DITA 1.2 elements needing styling and translatable strings
We need to discuss this. I'm generally not comfortable with
recommending how to style elements (and the DITA TC did not endorse us doing so
this morning, it just said this issue wasn't one for the DITA TC). It might be appropriate for the DITA Adoption TC to write a paper
about how new DITA 1.2 elements could be used which might touch on possible
styling, but we need to stop short of "recommended styling". paul From: Su-Laine Yeo [mailto:su-laine.yeo@justsystems.com]
Hello, The
DITA TC discussed this issue this morning, and concluded that it falls more
under the mandate of the Adoption TC. Is
the Adoption TC comfortable with producing a document containing recommendations
on how to style new DITA 1.2 elements? And if yes, does anyone have a draft
that can be used as a basis for the document? I could probably come up with a
draft if needed. Cheers, Su-Laine Su-Laine Yeo JustSystems Canada, Inc. XMetaL Community Forums: http://forums.xmetal.com/ From: Su-Laine Yeo
[mailto:su-laine.yeo@justsystems.com] Hi everyone, Is there a list of new DITA
elements and attributes for which processors are expected to apply special
styling and/or generated text? For example, the new
<note=”warning”> attribute needs a new string which needs to
be translated. It seems
that many of the new
elements for Learning & Training and Machine Industry also warrant some
kind of distinctive appearance, otherwise adopters will wonder why they are
bothering to use them. Who is responsible for
coming up with this list –
the DITA TC , the DITA
Adoption TC, or each
team that develops a DITA
processor? Su-Laine Su-Laine Yeo JustSystems
Canada, Inc. XMetaL Community Forums:
http://forums.xmetal.com/ |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]