[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita-comment] L&T specialization doc errors
Jon, this is the right place for reporting and discussing issues
with the specification. I have copied John Hunt, the Chair of the
activity that developed the L&T spec, so that he may contact you
if needed. So far, these appear to be bug fixes against the
documentation, but we'll look for systemic reasons for how they
occurred. I am always pleased to receive indications that people are reading the Spec so closely. If you come across anything else that needs to be brought to the attention of the OASIS DITA Technical Committee, please pass it along this way! "Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?
Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?"
--T.S. Eliot
On 1/20/2012 9:41 AM, Jon.Brams@bentley.com wrote: Hi all, (I'm not sure if posting to this list is the proper method for reporting DITA spec errors. If another method is preferable -- such as the bug tracker for the DITA-OT project on SourceForge -- please tell me and I will use that method.) I've noted the following errors in the Learning and Training specialization docs: * In "learningObject.dita", within the sample markup, "learningAssessmentRef" should read "learningPostAssessmentRef" (2 instances). * Similarly, in "learningGroup.dita", within the sample markup, "learningAssessmentRef" should read "learningPostAssessmentRef" (4 instances) * In "learningPreAssessmentRef.dita", in the element description, "learningAssessmentPreRef" should read "learningPreAssessmentRef" (1 instance). * Similarly, in learningPostAssessmentRef.dita", in the element description, "learningAssessmentPostRef" should read "learningPostAssessmentRef" (1 instance). Regards, Jon Brams -- Bentley Systems Exton, PA USA |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]