[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Layering in Help Systems
Greetings Colleagues, and Happy 2009! I'm interested in everybody's thoughts on whether layering features in Help systems can be applied globally based on semantic mark-up, or whether there is a need for "ad hoc" layering. By layering, I mean features such as popups, expansion links and dropdown links. By "ad hoc", I mean an author choosing that this lump of text would be best presented to the user in a dropdown, for example. As an example, let's say we render a footnote <fn> in the HTML output from a DITA collection as a popup. Can we apply a rule that says "in all cases (for this Help system), <fn> elements will be rendered as popups"? Or will there be an instance where we need to say "oh, THIS <fn> needs to be treated differently". If we further assume that a transformation process somehow links any <term> elements with a corresponding glossary entry into an expansion link to that glossary entry, can we safely way that this will happen in all instances within the help system? I'm trying to explore whether we actually need different semantic elements for "Help" features. It would be philosophical sound if we could avoid having help-centric DITA elements that ended up embedding presentation information in the content. Or having some type of DITA mark-up that only applied to Help systems. What do you all think? Regards Tony Self
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]