Hi Scott...
I can offer my opinions/observations, but hope that others in the
SC will chime in with theirs (which may differ from mine).
As I mentioned, there are ways to overlay multiple technologies
and "make things work" (free screen sharing, with free conf
calling and skype). This does work but can be challenging and is
distracting from actually getting things done. It's hard to
separate the screen sharing and audio since they are two sides of
the same discussion. Audio is always required and many times we
could probably get by with no screen sharing .. it depends on
what's being discussed.
The cost of a "toll" call in the US will vary based on the
caller's phone plan .. might be free or might be significant for
an hour+ meeting. I don't know what that is for international
calls, but it's likely to be significant.
We've been using GoToMeeting in the DITA-Help SC for some time
now, and in general it works quite well to have the audio and
screen sharing integrated. Webex offers a similar service, but I
think that GoToMeeting is probably less expensive.
The problem is that these licenses are assigned to individual
organizers. For GoToMeeting, one organizer can hold "unlimited"
meetings for $40 per month. Problem is that each group probably
only meets 2-3 times per month, maybe just once .. $40 for one
meeting is crazy. If this could be shared between multiple groups
it would be much more reasonable .. but that comes down to what's
allowed by the vendor.
You (OASIS) could buy a license and give the login information to
a number of people .. are these people acting as your
representative in a meeting so it's OK for them to hold meetings
at different times in the month? I'm sure the vendors would say
that this isn't allowed. If there was some way to actually pay for
each meeting rather than per meeting organizer it would be much
more reasonable.
This is all logistics that may be able to get worked out .. or
not.
It's fine to rely on members to provide these services, but when
the membership changes, a group can be left without access to
tools that they had been using (as has happened to us, I believe).
I go back to my earlier thought .. all of the vendors who offer
this service are members of OASIS. It seems that there should be
some creative way to work out an arrangement that would benefit
everyone. The vendor could claim to be supporting OASIS with this
tool, and the actual usage would really not be all that much.
Thanks for working on this!
Cheers,
...scott
On 2/28/12 2:22 PM, Scott McGrath wrote:
Hi Scott,
Allow me to share some insights, ask some questions of you
and other SC members and perhaps even move a bit closer to a
good answer.
first the questions:
I think I see three separate issues:
1. Screen sharing and meeting facilitation
2. Local/domestic call expenses
3. International call expenses
Of these three, how would you rank them - which would be most
productive to resolve? I know answering this will take some
conjecture if you assume "productive" means getting more folks
involved in your work or keeping folks involved in your work.
Best guesses are good.
How much of an impediment are these issues? Is resolving any
of them imperative to your progress, are they reasonable
courtesies to offer, or nice to have?
With your earlier use of Webex, did the integrated audio
solve some/all of the phone call issues?
Now, some answers and observations from my experience:
Most TCs have available member provided resources for
teleconference, at a minimum, and increasingly screen-sharing.
This comes from member's professional courtesy and generous
offer. I've heard some large members express that they are happy
to provide the resource, because they do want to support the
work any way they can--and their large scale economies
for teleconferencing is a readily available asset. It is very
infrequent that there is not a resource and anyone has to
consider pan-handling. Of course, that is no consolation to
anyone forced to pan-handle ;-) so we do want to prevent that.
I do know that providing services to all members across the
board is not feasible. I did a fairly deep analysis of possible
costs in 2006, when we had far fewer TCs. I considered the
cost if we provided international conferencing for all TC
meetings that had teleconferences on their calendar. The cost
would have been nearly 10% our annual operating budget. As a
non-profit that shares its costs among all the members, we
couldn't rationalize a 10% dues increase to provide a service
that was generally being provided already. Honestly, I think
many members believe having a few large members carrying the
conference costs internally is preferential to sharing it across
all members, but that may be a matter of perspective ;-)
We have experimented in the past, and based on your inquiry
will revisit, the idea of having limited resources available to
fill in the gaps where donated services are not available. It's
a delicate balance to provide necessary services without blowing
out the budget, but it is more feasible than funding services
across the board.
your committee's responses to the questions above will help
me maximize the value while containing the cost
to something reasonable (hopefully ;-))
Thanks for asking, thanks for reading this and for your
reply,
All the best,
Scott...
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Scott Prentice <sp10@leximation.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: [dita-help] Re: OASIS WebEx-type account
To: Chet Ensign < chet.ensign@oasis-open.org>
Cc: dita-help@lists.oasis-open.org
Hi Chet...
I've also used multiple combinations of "free"
services to organize meetings like this, but you
often end up spending the first 15 minutes getting
everything set up and working properly. Once
everyone has figured it out it goes a bit smoother,
but any time there are new people or changes, it's a
real hassle. Not to mention that the "free" is not
really free since people typically have to call in
to a single number in the US, which just pushes the
toll charge on each caller (we've got members in
Australia, India, and Europe). Yes, you can use
Skype to call into the number, which reduces the
cost, but increases the layers of technology that
can fail or distract from the focus of the meeting.
It seems that OASIS could buy a few GoToMeeting
licenses and let groups sign up for time slots ..
might just need two licenses to handle everyone (I
don't know the frequency of overlap, so this might
not be accurate). Also, I'm assuming that most TCs
do use some screen sharing app and not just audio
(where a "free conference call" service may be a
more reasonable option). If you split this cost up
over the number of TCs, the cost is likely to be
quite minimal.
It just doesn't seem right that TC members would
need to "beg" for a slice of a corporate or personal
license from another member. OASIS is a professional
organization and seems like it should be providing
the tools for its members to do their jobs as
efficiently as possible. Has this been discussed
before? I can't imagine that I'm the first person to
bring it up.
Thanks,
...scott
On 2/27/12 7:02 AM, Chet Ensign wrote:
Hi Kris,
No, we really don't. I use my Free
Conference Call and my Free International
Conference Call accounts for meetings that I
organize. There is also a Freescreensharing
facility from them although I haven't used it
yet. And of course we have the Soaphub chat
room facility (e.g. http://webconf.soaphub.org/conf/room/dita-help).
But we don't have a web conferencing facility
for TC use.
/chet
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012
at 11:11 PM, Kristen Eberlein <keberlein@sdl.com>
wrote:
Chet,
does OASIS have a WebEx-type
account that the DITA help SC
could use for their meetings?
Please let us know.
Best
regards,
Kris
Kristen
James Eberlein |
DITA Architect and Technical
Specialist |
SDL Structured Content
Technologies Division |
(t)
+ 1 (919)
682-2290|
keberlein@sdl.com
Santa Clara | March
5-6 www.sdl.com/innovate
Hi
Tony...
I've got a GoToMeeting account
(not corporate, just the base
model) that we could use if needed
until a proper replacement is
found.
Never really thought about his
before, but it seems that OASIS
should be providing this for these
meetings, no? We shouldn't need to
scrounge around for a method to
communicate. Am I out of line in
thinking this?
Cheers,
...scott
On 2/24/12 3:24 AM, Tony Self wrote:
Greetings colleagues
It looks like we might have lost access to the GoToMeeting service that
we've been using for the past couple of years, and I have been consequently
unable to set up the meeting for next Monday afternoon (US time). Could I
suggest we postpone the meeting until we've found a replacement WebEx or
GoToMeeting service?
Does anyone have a corporate GoToMeeting or WebEx service that we could use?
Best regards
Tony Self
Chair, DITA Help Subcommittee and DITA Adoption Help Subcommittee
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dita-adoption-help-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dita-adoption-help-help@lists.oasis-open.org
--
/chet
----------------
Chet Ensign
Director of Standards Development and TC
Administration
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the
information society
http://www.oasis-open.org
Primary: +1
973-378-3472
Mobile: +1
201-341-1393
Follow OASIS on:
LinkedIn: http://linkd.in/OASISopen
Twitter: http://twitter.com/OASISopen
Facebook: http://facebook.com/oasis.open
--
/chet
----------------
Chet Ensign
Director of Standards Development and TC Administration
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information
society
http://www.oasis-open.org
Primary: +1 973-378-3472
Mobile: +1 201-341-1393
Follow OASIS on:
LinkedIn: http://linkd.in/OASISopen
Twitter: http://twitter.com/OASISopen
Facebook: http://facebook.com/oasis.open
--
Scott McGrath
COO
scott.mcgrath@oasis-open.org
Tel +1 781-425-5073 x202
Fax +1 781-425-5072
Follow OASIS on:
LinkedIn: http://linkd.in/OASISopen
Twitter: http://twitter.com/OASISopen
Facebook: http://facebook.com/oasis.open
|