[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Implications of Subcomponents of lcBase Not Being Topics
I'm starting a project with a publisher of test prep books. These consist of practice tests and lessons with most of the content being individual questions. One chief business goal is to be able to have a database of individual questions that can then be used directly or by tracked copy into different publications. For example, each U.S. state may have its own version of the 8th Grade Language Arts test prep where the questions are essentially same across all the states but other content is state specific. Or the same question may be applicable to several different grade levels. I would like to make the XML application we develop for this client at least DITA compatible if not directly DITA based. To that end I've pulled down the March 8 learning SC plugin and I'm looking at it. I had the possibly naive expectation that each question would be a topic but I see that questions are subelements within a specialization of section. The immediate challenge I see is that if questions are not topics in their own right there is no good DITA-conforming way to manage individual questions as individual storage objects--they have to be stored within a topic even if the intent is to use conref to get them. This suggests that in my case the only solution would be to create a topic type whose only purpose is to hold a single question. That doesn't seem like a necessarily bad thing, if for no other reason than that it provides a way to bind a title and specialized metadata to the question. The counter question is "if questions were topics what would their titles be?" I suspect the SC has already chewed on that question. The only answers I could come up with were "The question statement is the title" and "something descriptive of the learning objective the question assesses, e.g. "Multiply two two-digit numbers" or "Identify the subject and object of a sentence". Has anyone else thought about the question-level re-use use case where each question should be (or may need to be) managed independently of all other questions? Cheers, Eliot -- Eliot Kimber Senior Solutions Architect "Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together" Main: 610.631.6770 www.reallysi.com www.rsuitecms.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]