OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

dita-learningspec message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [dita-learningspec] Learning content and the Release mgt domain


They need to be available for those who need it, but certainly not in the way of those who don't. So I think your proposed solution is fine.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID


Amber Swope <amber@ditastrategies.com> wrote:

I’m fine either way…

Amber

 

Amber Swope

dita specialist

<dita strategies>

503.922.3038

amber@ditastrategies.com

 

 

 

From: dita-learningspec@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:dita-learningspec@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Hudson, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 8:15 AM
To: John Hunt
Cc: dita-learningspec@lists.oasis-open.org; Kristen James Eberlein
Subject: Re: [dita-learningspec] Learning content and the Release mgt domain

 

I don’t have a problem including it, as these elements are not mandatory, but can be used if needed. 

 

Thanks and best regards,

--Scott
Scott Hudson   |   PELCO  by Schneider Electric   |   United States  |   Standards & Information Architect 
Phone:
 +1 970 282 1952  |  Mobile: +1 720 369 2433  | Email: scott.hudson@schneider-electric.com

 

 

On Mar 19, 2014, at 9:01 AM, john_hunt@us.ibm.com wrote:



Dear L&T Sub-committee members and list -

DITA 1.3 will include a new "Release management domain," which is described in this Stage 3 proposal - https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/50971/13102_Stage3Proposal.pdf.

Essentially, this domain is included with the Technical-content domain elements and provides additional metadata elements (11 by my count) for tracking content changes, including the person, organization, summary of the change, and key dates.

Kris has asked if we want it included or not with the default content models for the L&T topics.

My personal take is that since the default L&T content models do not include the other Tech-content domains, such as programming or software elements, or the new equation, mathml, and svg domains, that we keep the Release mgt domain optional as well. This leaves it to the implementers to decide, based on the content types and mgt systems they use.

What do others think?  Please get back to me with your input by the end of the day this Friday if possible, so we can get back to the Kris and the TC with a recommendation.  

Thanks much in advance!

John
___________________________________
John Hunt

Chair, OASIS DITA Learning and Training Content Sub-Committee
Senior Technical Content Architect
IBM Collaboration Solutions | User Experience: Design and Information Excellence
4205 S. Miami Blvd, Durham, NC 27703
john_hunt@us.ibm.com

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
______________________________________________________________________

 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]