Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Full DITA compatibility

["Noz Urbina" <noz.urbina@urbinaconsulting.com>]

Mark, yes, that's a good point... I can see a content model having
title-less sections all over the place. Things that are meaningful to the
organisation but wouldn't be explicitly called out to the reader with
headings.

I see that your present slidedeck, Michael, mentions using constraints to
"get rid of sections or get rid of content outside sections
(http://www.slideshare.net/mpriestley/a-lightweight-dita-update). I'd
favour losing sections as a default. What we set as a default I think is
enormously impactful. However then we have the issue of title-less topics,
if subtopics are used to replace sections.





On Mon, May 11, 2015 10:12 am, Mark Poston wrote:
> Not sure I agree with that statement. Sections are also very useful to
> break content up into more semantic groupings that do not necessarily need
> a title. A title might be implied by the name of the specialised tag, and
> not actually require the title element itself. It is then down to the
> delivery stylesheet to decide whether a title is displayed or not.
>
> <prereq>, <context> etc. in a task are examples of this.
>
>
>
> On 11/05/2015 08:20, "Noz Urbina" <noz.urbina@urbinaconsulting.com>
> wrote:
>
>>The entire point of a section would be to have a heading.
>


-- 
Noz Urbina
Content Strategist and Founder, UrbinaConsulting.com

Author, "Content Strategy: Connecting the dots between, business, brand,
and benefits" http://thecontentstrategybook.com