RE: [dita-lightweight-dita] LW DITA DTDs - adding <fig>

[Michael Priestley <mpriestl@ca.ibm.com>]

In the discussion today, one of the goals
was to limit the number of different editing contexts - effectively, the
number of different rules about what's allowed where.

We tried to balance these considerations:


 - want to limit choices to help
usability
 - but want to increase consistency
to help usability

We tried to keep the content model for
fig as close as possible to the content model for section - only eliminating
fig itself because that would have broken the mapping to full DITA.

So the content model we arrived at was:
<!ENTITY % fig-blocks  "p|ul|ol|dl|pre|%object;|simpletable">


Michael Priestley, Senior Technical
Staff Member (STSM)
Enterprise Content Technology Strategist
mpriestl@ca.ibm.com
http://dita.xml.org/blog/michael-priestley



From:      
 Amber Swope <amber@ditastrategies.com>
To:      
 Kristen James Eberlein
<kris@eberleinconsulting.com>, dita-lightweight-dita@lists.oasis-open.org
Date:      
 08/10/2015 01:05 PM
Subject:    
   RE: [dita-lightweight-dita]
LW DITA DTDs - adding <fig>
Sent by:    
   <dita-lightweight-dita@lists.oasis-open.org>

---

Hi there,

I've had folks want to use definition lists, ordered lists, and unordered
lists for legends, but never had a use case for cross references or
paragraphs. If we could make a recommendation for supporting figure legends,
then maybe we could limit the available elements.
Amber

-----Original Message-----
From: dita-lightweight-dita@lists.oasis-open.org
[mailto:dita-lightweight-dita@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Kristen
James Eberlein
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 10:01 AM
To: dita-lightweight-dita@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] LW DITA DTDs - adding <fig>

For what it is worth, for all clients for whom I've implemented constraints,
everyone ONLY wanted fig to contain image, object, title, data, and and
desc.

I can see a use case for <pre> and <simpletable>, but what
would use cases
for xref, dl, pl, ul, or p be?

Best,
Kris

Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)

On 8/10/2015 2:37 AM, Mark Giffin wrote:
> I am adding <fig> to the Lightweight DITA DTDs and I need some
> agreement on what to leave out. <fig> can contain many elements
and
> attributes in full DITA.
>
> I think I should leave out these elements for LW DITA:
>
> figgroup, fn, lines, lq, note, sl, data-about
>
> I'm leaving in these elements, which were already allowed:
>
> title, desc, data, simpletable, xref, dl, image, object, ol, p, pre,
> ul
>
> Thoughts? I'm still working on the attributes.
>
> Mark Giffin
> Mark Giffin Consulting, Inc.
> http://markgiffin.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS
at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that 
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php