[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Footnote desired in LW DITA?
Because Jan did say 'footnote', I want to pry once more on
assumptions: that we are talking about the equivalent of regular
DITA's <fn> element (generally relocated from its source
context when rendered) and not the HTML5 <footnote> element,
which is a location placeholder in HTML5 (whose content is rendered
For Lightweight DITA, the latter <footnote> could be specialized as needed from section, specifically the final section in a body. I think Noz and I are both agreeing strongly that the <fn> version has a place in the core content definition. But we can discuss that at a review pass once we have the architectural features firmed up (like specialization, where things still need proven).
On 4/3/2016 1:44 PM, Noz Urbina wrote:
Don R. Day
Founding Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
LinkedIn: donrday Twitter: @donrday
About.me: Don R. Day Skype: don.r.day
"Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?
Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?"