[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Notes in Lightweight DITA
Agreed on Option #1 for the reasons Scott has already outlined.
From: firstname.lastname@example.org <email@example.com> on behalf of Scott Hudson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Friday, May 6, 2016 3:52:23 PM
To: Michael Priestley; email@example.com
Subject: RE: [dita-lightweight-dita] Notes in Lightweight DITA
I vote Option 1 for consistency in authoring between full and lightweight. I think the other options differ too much from full DITA and could lead to potential confusion.
Close second for Option 2, as I could see potential use for hazard-statements where the hazard symbol could be contained in a dt and the body of the hazard statement in the dd.
I still prefer Option 1 though.
Thanks and best regards,
Training & Documentation
Jeppesen | Digital Aviation | Boeing
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]
On Behalf Of Michael Priestley
We discussed a number of options in our last SC call - feedback/suggestions/votes needed to help us move forward.