Re: Do we need multi-level specialization?

["Michael Priestley" <mpriestl@ca.ibm.com>]

OK I've had one vote on this, saying they
don't need multi-level specialization.

Anyone else have input?

Do the learning and training specializations
depend on more than one level?

Michael Priestley, Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
Enterprise Content Technology Strategist
mpriestl@ca.ibm.com
http://dita.xml.org/blog/michael-priestley



From:      
 Michael Priestley/Toronto/IBM
To:      
 dita-lightweight-dita@lists.oasis-open.org
Date:      
 06/14/2016 01:35 PM
Subject:    
   Do we need multi-level
specialization?

---

In our last call we were struggling
with how to represent multiple levels of inheritance in Lightweight DITA,
especially in non-XML forms like HTML5 and Markdown.

But backing up a bit, Don asked the
question: do we even really need multiple levels in Lightweight?

Do we have any examples where multi-level
specialization would be required? That is, any examples where a specialization
would need to be based off another existing specialization, rather than
off of elements in topic or map.

Michael Priestley, Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
Enterprise Content Technology Strategist
mpriestl@ca.ibm.com
http://dita.xml.org/blog/michael-priestley