dita-lightweight-dita message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Added <fn> to DTDs
- From: "Michael Priestley" <mpriestl@ca.ibm.com>
- To: Mark Giffin <mark@markgiffin.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:19:23 -0400
Hi Mark,
fn should actually be a block element,
per:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita-lightweight-dita/201605/msg00031.html
It should have a required id attribute,
and the same standard attributes as other block elements in lightweight
DITA (we don't use the select-atts entity in LW DITA): %localization, %filters,
%reuse, and the class attribute.
There's no issue with the extra value
in the video/audio class attribute - it's required to make it valid DITA.
It does mean, if we decide not to support multi-level specialization, that
people will not be able to specialize audio or video.
FYI here are the emails for note and
the specialization elements/atts:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita-lightweight-dita/201605/msg00032.html
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita-lightweight-dita/201605/msg00033.html
Michael Priestley, Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
Enterprise Content Technology Strategist
mpriestl@ca.ibm.com
From:
Mark Giffin <mark@markgiffin.com>
To:
"dita-lightweight-dita@lists.oasis-open.org"
<dita-lightweight-dita@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:
07/10/2016 10:48 PM
Subject:
[dita-lightweight-dita]
Added <fn> to DTDs
Sent by:
<dita-lightweight-dita@lists.oasis-open.org>
I am in the process of updating the LWDITA DTDs. I
just added <fn> to
topic.mod. I added fn to the all-inline content model used by shortdesc,
p, pre, ph, dt.
If you want to see a diff of the changes, it is here:
https://github.com/oasis-open/dita-lightweight/commit/91dfc9143d2ef5f4ba744f64de6c035d47f836cf
I will also soon add <note> per recent discussions, and the
specialization elements and attributes (spec*).
I had a couple of questions:
1. In DITA 1.3 <fn> includes the %select-atts; attributes. I left
them
out, do we need these in LWDITA?
2. I finally removed <object> from the DTD. I notice that <audio>
and
<video> still have object in their class attributes like this: "+
topic/object h5m-d/audio " -- will this cause any problems given that
object is not defined?
Thanks,
Mark Giffin
Mark Giffin Consulting, Inc.
http://markgiffin.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]