[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Fw: [dita-lightweight-dita] templae specialization, some remarks
Untortunately, this mail come back. It seems that I am not allowed to send a mail to the whole group.
Can you please forward it? Maybe it is not relevant anymore after the call yesterday, but maybe well.
Kind regards, Birgit
-------- Oorspronkelijke bericht --------
Onderwerp: | [dita-lightweight-dita] templae specialization, some remarks |
Datum: | 27-11-2016 11:45 |
Afzender: | xstructuring02 <xstructuring02@server48.firstfind.nl> |
Ontvanger: | dita-lightweight-dita@lists.oasis-open.org |
Hello Tim and all,
I have tried to generate a RNG from my marketing-template. This was no problem and I have got a RNG. After I got the RNG I have treid to generate a XSD from it (using Oxygen). The XSD I get is not valide. This depends on some problems.
First: In the RNG stands:
<start combine="choice">
<element name="marketingtopic">
<optional>
<attribute name="class" a:defaultValue="/marketingtopic
"/>
</optional>
<ref name="topic.attributes"/>
<ref name="topic.content"/>
<ref name="title"/>
<element name="prolog">
<ref name="prolog.attlist"/>
</element>
<element name="marketingbody">...
There shouldn't stand a <ref name="topic.content"/> because this make that you get twice the element title and prolog etc. I put this ref in a XML commetn before generating the XSD.
After generating the XSD I get error-messages about the elements I have specialized on <p> and <xref>.
E.g. in my template I have:
<p outputclass="action" important="optional">
<xref outputclass="actionref"/>
</p>
This become in the RNG
<element name="action">
<optional>
<attribute name="class" a:defaultValue="/action
"/>
</optional>
<ref name="p.attributes"/>
<ref name="p.content"/>
<element name="actionref">
<optional>
<attribute name="class" a:defaultValue="/actionref
"/>
</optional>
<ref name="xref.attributes"/>
<ref name="xref.content"/>
</element>
</element>
This looks ok, but in the XSD it went wrong and I get the message that "E [Xerces] cos-nonambig: image and image (or elements from their substitution group) violate "Unique Particle Attribution". During validation against this schema, ambiguity would be created for those two particles."
Honestly, I am not sure if the RNG is wrong or that something went wrong during generating the XSD.
Another problem is that because I cannot define a choice group fort the specialization of section I get a required order even if I set important=”optional” for the child elements.
Example:
<section outputclass="marketingsection" important="optional">
<!-- specmodel="choice" -->
<dl outputclass="features"
important="optional">
<dlentry outputclass="feature"
specmodel="sequence">
<dt
outputclass="featureterm"/>
<dd
outputclass="featuredef"/>
</dlentry>
</dl>
<dl outputclass="specifications"
important="optional">
<dlentry outputclass="specification"
specmodel="sequence">
<dt
outputclass="specifiedterm"/>
<dd
outputclass="specifieddesc"/>
</dlentry>
</dl>
<ul outputclass="highlights"
important="optional">
<li outputclass="highlight"/>
</ul>
<p outputclass="action"
important="optional">
<xref outputclass="actionref"/>
</p>
<fig outputclass="quote"
important="optional">
<xref outputclass="quoteref"/>
</fig>
</section>
When I create a XML-document with the RNG I am not allowed to delete feature within the marketingsection. So we really have to think about how we can specialize elements which basic content model is a sequence of an element followed by de choice-group.
Attached you find the template, the RNG and the XSD.
Kind regards, Birgit
Attachment:
template_marketing_v02.xml
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
marketing.rng
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
marketing.xsd
Description: Binary data
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]