OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

dita-lightweight-dita message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] LwDITA DTD/feature questions

Alan, great e-mail. I am delighted that someone new is looking critically at the DTDs.

I think at this point all your questions are answered. Like Robert, I think @processing-role is necessary on <topicref> elements, so that we do not break rules for specialization.

And at this point, it's time for the DITA TC to take a long and hard work at LwDITA. Any questions can be answered there.


Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
+1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)

On 6/4/2017 11:02 PM, Alan Houser wrote:

A few questions about the Lightweight DITA DTDs and LwDITA features --

- The content model and attribute set for <data> is different in maps and topics (content model: <data> in <topic> allows #PCDATA; <data> in <map> does not. And the attributes are different). Is that intentional?

- LwDITA does not provide the DITA filtering attributes? (O.K. with me; just confirming).

- LwDITA does not provide a generic metadata container attribute (e.g., @outputclass)?

- Should we provide @processing-role on <topicref>? I'm thinking of the use case of referencing a "keydef-only" ditamap (@processing-role = "resource-only").


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]