[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: comparison of simpletable and HTML5 tables
Colleagues,I regret that I will likely miss today's Lightweight DITA SC meeting (I'm at IEEE Procomm this week).
In support of today's discussion, I've attached a brief analysis that compares simpletable to HTML5 tables.
If I were present, I would note the elegance of the HTML5 table design. The markup is quite simple, and expressions of simple tables are ... simple. But the table design also provides necessary capabilities for semantic tables, through colgroup and the ability to formally associate "header" cells (any cell can be a header) with body cells.
-Alan -- Alan Houser Group Wellesley, Inc. Consultant and Trainer, Technical Publishing arh on Twitter 412-450-0532Title: Comparison of DITA simpletable and HTML5 tables
Comparison of DITA simpletable and HTML5 tablesThis document attempts to summarize the similarities and differences between the DITA simpletable model and HTML5 tables, with two goals:
The following table lists attributes tthat are specific to DITA simpletable. It does not include members of universal DITA attribute groups.
The following table lists attributes that are specific to HTML5 table components. This table does not include universal HTML5 attributes.
Notable aspects of HTML5 table model
Possible modifications to simpletableThe following additions to simpletable would improve alignment with the HTML5 table model. Note:
simpletable and its components are base elements in DITA 1.3. (i.e., they are not specialized element types). Their content models and attribute sets can be modified without consideration of the DITA rules of specialization.
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]