OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

dita-machine-industry message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Naming of SI / Imperial System


Collegues
 
As discussed at our last meeting I have investigated what would be the most common wording to be used for an attribute mentioning if it is an SI value or an US value for quantities.
 
The two most convenient versions would be:
 
Units of Measurement
System of Units
or
System of Measurement
 
(For the example I will use system-of-measurement="...")
 
As values we either have to decide to keep it open or we are going to use an enumerated list.
Most convenient values would be:
SI
Metric
 
US
Imperial
English
 
but there are other systems also used, but not common:
 
Natural
-Geometric
-Planck
-Stoney
-Schrödinger
-Atomic
-Electronic
-Quantum Electrodynamic
 
and there are also some none-standard units who do not belong to any of the mentioned above, like megaton, football pitch,
 
as well as systems used in other cultural areas, e.g.
middle eastern system of measurement
asian system of measurement
 
or no longer used abbreviations in the metric system:
mks
cgs
 
or ancient, historical systems of measurements.
 
*************
 
a minimal enumerated list would be:
SI
Imperial
other
 
or we may choose a broader list like:
 
SI
Metric
US
Imperial
Natural
None-standard
Other
 
(For the example I will use this list)
 
or we just leave it open.
 
We will discuss this on our next meeting.
 
Best regards
 
Chris

 

SeicoDyne GmbH
Eichenstrasse 16
CH-6015 Reussbühl
Switzerland
Tel: +41 41 534 66 97
Mob: +41 78 790 66 97
Skype: seicodyne
 
 
Member of the DITA Technical Committee
Chairman of the DITA Machine Industry Subcommittee
 


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]