[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: AW: [dita] Examples for the Quantities & Tolearances Proposal
Actually we have not done any thought about con/keyref. The standard con/keyref functionalities seems to us as sufficient. The quantity element is a specialisation of phrase, and yes, it is an inline element. May I ask you to give us some more details to your def/ref idea. I haven’t understood it yet. Best regards Chris Von: Noz Urbina [mailto:noz.urbina@mekon.com] Hi Chris, How do you envisage reuse happening from the <quantity> sub-elements to the actual topics?Con(key)ref? Or are the quantity definitions intended to be data-integrity checked in some other way? Or am I misreading this and the quantities will be defined inline, e.g., <p>The acceptable length for the item is </p> ? If so the option of a def/ref pair seems like a good idea here. So the XML would be: <p>The acceptable length for the item is <quantityref @somethingThatPointsToAQuantity/></p> Just my thoughts. Cheers Noz From: dita@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:dita@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Chris Kravogel Please find enclosed the examples/use cases for the quantities and tolerances proposal. Please reply if you have any questions or comments regarding the proposal and the examples. Best regards Chris |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]