[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: Extend Enterprise Business Documents toward Pharma?
Hi Joel: The way I see it, there would have to be a sub-specialization for Pharma content, and from what I have seen so far not all that much would be applicable due to the highly specialized nature of Pharma content.
Among other things, that is why it was decided to set up a separate SC for Pharma content. Regards, Gabor From: Joel Finkle [mailto:Joel.Finkle@imagesolutions.com]
Gabor, So have you see specializations of DITA there that would be of value to Pharmaceutical/Regulatory documents, or things that would be a problem? Joel ----
From: Gabor Fari [mailto:Gabor.Fari@microsoft.com]
I have been very aware of this working group for years, and have been speaking to the co-chairs, Ann Rockley and Mike Boses about cross-pollination of efforts. Mike is actually on the PC-SC as well. -
Gabor From: Joel Finkle [mailto:Joel.Finkle@imagesolutions.com]
I just stumbled upon another DITA subcommittee's documentation, that of Enterprise Business Documents. There's a great presentation at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/36620/Business%20Content%20Metamodel-1.pptx The document types they're working on are certainly different from regulatory submission documents, for the most part, but I can see that a company that already has its HR documents, policies and procedures, etc. built on this should be
able to start extending into regulatory documentation. This may help us frame the kinds of extensions to the DITA model that we will need for things such as protocols, reports, etc. On the other hand, this may steer us into thinking in terms of extension to their data types (Event and Governance, for instance, sound useful) but might be dead ends in terms of creating our kinds of documents. At its worst, companies
might say that you can't build a DITA-based protocol without having DITA-based SOPs, DITA-based Policies, etc. etc. which could slow down acceptance. In any case, it's worth a read. Joel ----
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete
the material from all computers. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete
the material from all computers. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]