[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: 2009-05-13 teleconference recording and notes
https://www115.livemeeting.com/cc/freescale/view?id=sidsc-090513
Additionally, here are the notes I capture in text during the call:
Guiding principle: loosening constraints in later versions of the DTD incurs
less risk for backward compatibility than adding tighter constraints; therefore
we should err on the side of being more constrained when possible.____________________
D3 p. 63. registerPropset. Annette notes that all elements contained within
registerPropset are shown to have an instance of ONE. However, for
addressOffset: We sometimes have more than one address associated with a
register (a separate address for each access type). For registerResetValue: we
sometimes don't provide a reset value at the register level.
We need to verify whether we need to change the DTD. Here are 2 use cases
requiring more than one or less than one.RECOMMENDATION: we should define several use cases, and implement each to prove
the model.Seth (offline): multiple arrays are supported by the dimension attribute ... is
that adequate?>> actions: retrofit unresolved comments from D3 to D4, break this one out to
new email thread, each member to gather UC examples.____________________
D3 p. 78. bitFieldPropset. Is the bitFieldAccess field required? We don't always
identify the access type at the bit level.>> actions: verify that the data model fully supports both use cases (specify
access for all fields at the register level, or specify / override access at the
bit field level). (Tom Cihak)____________________
D3 p. 84. bitFieldAccess. Annette: Are we restricted to the values defined here?
(Does DITA check?) I think there's at least one more possibility for a reserved
field (I'll have to verify.)
Bob: We are not restricted and DITA is not going to check. This would have to be
tool enforcement. Annette needs to check and let us know about whether she has
another case for reserved. (I've sent the query to Annette).>> comment added to D4 PDF ... Annette to forward her added possible values to
the dita-sidsc list.
Respectfully,
Bob
Beims
Chair, DITA TC
SIDSC
Applications
Engineer, Staff Principal
Microcontroller Solutions Group
Freescale Semiconductor,
Inc. |
This e-mail,
and any associated attachments have been classified as:
[X]Public
[
]Freescale Semiconductor Internal Use Only
[ ]Freescale Semiconductor
Confidential Proprietary
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]