dita-sidsc message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita-sidsc] bitFieldReset issue
- From: "Park Seth-R01164" <R01164@freescale.com>
- To: "Semiconductor Information Design Subcommittee" <dita-sidsc@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:43:44 -0700
Ah. So I should be using "value" and "trigger", as
in:
<bitFieldReset>
<bitFieldResetValue>1</bitFieldResetValue>
<bitFieldResetTrig>POR</bitFieldResetTrig>
</bitFieldReset>
Cool. I just got hung up on the word
"source".
Thx.
-sp
--------------------------------------------
seth park
information architect
Freescale Semiconductor,
Inc.
512.895.2463
Actually, I think there's a slight disconnect
here.
Isn't the bitFieldresetValueSource specifying a signal,
which has it's own value? It's not saying what causes the reset, just that the
value on reset is going to be whatever the value of that signal
is.
I'm not sure that solves your problem but I don't think
...ValueSource can be used the way you want to use it.
Mike
Austin
MSG IMM Information
Architect
Freescale Semiconductor,
Inc.
512-895-8910
mike.austin@freescale.com
It says that "The
<bitFieldResetValue> and <bitFieldresetValueSource> elements are
mutually exclusive," which means that you can have...
EITHER
<bitFieldReset>
<bitFieldResetValueSource>HRESET</bitFieldResetValueSource>
<bitFieldResetTrig>System Reset</bitFieldResetTrig>
</bitFieldReset>
OR
<bitFieldReset>
<bitFieldResetValue>0</bitFieldResetValue>
<bitFieldResetTrig>System
Reset</bitFieldResetTrig>
</bitFieldReset>
BUT
NEVER
<bitFieldReset>
<bitFieldResetValue>0</bitFieldResetValue>
<bitFieldResetValueSource>System
Reset</bitFieldResetValueSource>
</bitFieldReset>
I'm trying to
capture a field definition of a field that has a different reset value when the
reset source is from a "Power on Reset". When it is a system reset, the field
resets to "0"; when it is a POR, it resets to "1". But the data model does not
allow this combination.
Can we agree that
this is a valid combination and that the DTD/spec should be
relaxed?
-seth
--------------------------------------------
seth park
information architect
Freescale Semiconductor,
Inc.
512.895.2463
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]