[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Fw: Updated Acronym Proposal posted
Forwarding Erik's response to Felix so it gets into the archives. Robert D Anderson IBM Authoring Tools Development Chief Architect, DITA Open Toolkit (507) 253-8787, T/L 553-8787 (Good Monday & Thursday) ----- Forwarded by Robert D Anderson/Rochester/IBM on 02/01/2008 01:09 PM ----- Erik Hennum/Oakland/IB M To Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> 02/01/2008 12:42 cc PM bhertz@sdl.com, Bryan Schnabel <bryan.s.schnabel@tek.com>, christian.lieske@sap.com, dpooley@sdl.com, esrig-ia@esrig.com, rfletcher@sdl.com, "Howard.Schwartz" <Howard.Schwartz@trados.com>, ishida@w3.org, rmraya@maxprograms.com, tony.jewtushenko@productinnovator.c om, KARA@CA.IBM.COM, ysavourel@translate.com, jogden@ptc.com, Robert D Anderson/Rochester/IBM Subject Re: Updated Acronym Proposal posted (Document link: Robert D Anderson) Hi, Felix: Here's the approved controlled values proposal, which can define simple enumerations but can also scale up to define hierarchical (taxonomic) relationships between concepts: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dita/download.php/26359/IssueControlledValues12031.html Yes, <glossAlt> captures an alternate term for the same meaning. The association of a glossentry topic defining a term sense with a Wordnet sysnset would just be a special case of linking (where the link indicates a processable relation rather than just traversal to a new document). So, one way to do that would be to use a related link within the glossentry topic, as in the following example: ... <glossentry id="usbfd"> ....... <glossterm>USB flash drive</glossterm> ....... <glossdef>A small portable drive.</glossdef> ....... <glossBody> ... </glossBody> ....... <related-links> ........... <link format="html" role="other" otherrole="equivalent" href=" http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=nonvolatile+storage"> ............... <linktext>Nonvolatile storage</linktext> ........... </link> ....... <related-links> ... </glossentry> Probably there is a better URL for the synset rather than the lexical label, but you get the idea. Anyway, many times, the relationship won't be exact equivalence but instead a kind-of or part-of relationship. For that reason, I'd suggest instead using the specialized map provided by the controlled values proposal to specify the link: ... <subjectScheme> ....... <subjectdef format="html" navtitle="Nonvolatile storage" href=" http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=nonvolatile+storage"> ........... <hasKind> ............... <subjectdef navtitle="USB flash drive" href="usbfd.dita"/> ............... references to other hyponyms of "Nonvolatile storage" defined locally or elsewhere ........... </hasKind> ....... </subjectdef> ....... references to other hypernyms defined by WordNet, by local glossentry topics, or elsewhere ... </subjectScheme> In fact, it should be possible to convert the core of WordNet into a set of DITA glossentry topics related by a DITA subjectScheme map, thus making the WordNet sense definitions available for local processing in a DITA XML format. Hoping that's interesting, Erik Hennum ehennum@us.ibm.com > Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> > 01/29/2008 05:30 PM > > Subject > > Re: Updated Acronym Proposal posted > > Hello Robert or others, > > I have a question about > "The enumeration is validated by means of the proposed controlled values > mechanism" > and "(Please see the Proposal 12031 for Controlled Values.)" > is the formulation of this proposal available? > > Also I saw the requirement "List synonyms, abbreviations, acronyms, and > other alternative terms with the same meaning. (Called a synomym set by > WordNet; please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synsets.)" > If I understand correctly, the <glossAlt> element is used for this > purpose. My question here is: is it possible to have here reference to > an external source, e.g. an WordNet entry, and if yes, is it possible to > specify what kind of processing is needed for such a reference? In the > case of WordNet you might not point to a lexical item directly but to an > identifier of a sysnset The necessary processing would be the resolution > of an appropriate lexical item from that identifier.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]