OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

dita message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [dita] namespaces goals

I continue to feel strongly that the class attribute should be 
associated with it's own namespace as discussed in my latest post in the 
Namespace resolution thread.

I think that requiring just this one namespace is consistent with all of 
the 1.0 goals Erik outlined.

I would like to see namespaces associated with packages--I don't see 
must risk here and it's the only way so far identified to handle package 
name conflicts, but I think we could endure not doing them in 1.0.

I do not see a need to do any namespace qualification of element type 
names and attributes (other than the class attribute) in the working 
DTDs and schemas.


W. Eliot Kimber
Professional Services
Innodata Isogen
9390 Research Blvd, #410
Austin, TX 78759
(512) 372-8122


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]