OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

dita message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: [no subject]



-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Antonov [mailto:apg@syntext.com]=20
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 10:33 AM
To: DITA TC list
Subject: RE: [dita] Recommendations for "page break" requests?

On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 21:02, Don Day wrote:

> I'm not finding great possibilities in my searches either. Unicode=20
> provides a set of characters that are directives for formatters, but I

> REALLY don't want writers to learn about that Pandora's box. PIs would

> be much easier to detect and handle in processing, particularly since=20
> they provide an opportunity for conditional use, which a codepoint=20
> does not. Oh, I'm not convinced yet, just working up the nerve to=20
> accept the idea.

Are you sure you want to use PI's?=20

- they cannot be validated by Schema or DTD (during the authoring
process, too)
- if you want to tweak processing of some element, what you do? Insert
PI before, after, or inside? Processing attribute in such case is much
more intuitive, at least with XSLT
- using attribute or element is easier from the authoring perspective:
you can define element specialization and enumeration for the value of
such attribute.

So let us at least consider alternative approach: having special
attribute and/or element, with no well-defined semantics, which should
be ignored by default.=20


-- Paul   =20

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]