[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita] Groups - DITA 1.1 Issue #20 (IssueNumber20.html) uploaded
> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Grosso [mailto:pgrosso@arbortext.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 12:04 PM > To: dita@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [dita] Groups - DITA 1.1 Issue #20 (IssueNumber20.html) > uploaded > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: mpriestl@ca.ibm.com [mailto:mpriestl@ca.ibm.com] > > Sent: Monday, 2005 July 25 18:52 > > To: dita@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: [dita] Groups - DITA 1.1 Issue #20 (IssueNumber20.html) uploaded > > ... > > The document named DITA 1.1 Issue #20 (IssueNumber20.html) has been > > submitted by Michael Priestley to the OASIS Darwin Information Typing > > Architecture (DITA) TC document repository. > > > > Document Description: > > Extensible metadata attributes for conditional processing (includes > > proposal to make all attributes specializable) ... > > I'm interested in this issue, but I'm unclear on the status. > > The above document outlines the issue, but not the proposed > solution, right? I second Paul's request. I would very much like to see a concrete proposal. I'd also like to hear some clarification on why adding attributes is OK for metadata attributes but not in the general case. Chris
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]