[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita] Proposal for generalized attribute addition
A restriction to tokenized values seems
quite severe to me. No CDATA attributes? No URLs? Even under my proposal “meta”
and “props” would share the same model. In XSLT 2.0 I’m pretty sure that
they could be unified at the code level as well. In XSLT 1.0 I’m not as sure. I admit
that all of the parsing, splitting and unescaping would get pretty ugly in XSLT
1.0. It might be easier to handle after pre-processing or through extension
functions. From: Michael
Priestley [mailto:mpriestl@ca.ibm.com]
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]