[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita] Groups - New Action Item #0023 Embedding version numbersin cat...
I mostly agree with Eliot (though I have a different opinion of public identifiers). I add one comment below. > -----Original Message----- > From: Eliot Kimber [mailto:ekimber@innodata-isogen.com] > Sent: Monday, 2005 September 12 17:10 > To: dita@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [dita] Groups - New Action Item #0023 Embedding > version numbersin cat... > Thus, the general practice is that namespace URIs are > invariant and do > not include any sort of version identifier. That is, DITA is > DITA in all its versions. I certainly agree with this in principle and would like to see us maintain this. However, if we decide to do some renaming under the guise of "naming convention cleanup" in DITA 2.0, we might find ourselves deciding to bump the namespace. paul
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]