[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita] FrameMaker as DITA Publishing Engine
You're right! I transposed those two entries. Thanks for the feedback. If you have further feedback, we can discuss it on this list: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dita-ot-developer Thanks again. Paul Prescod > -----Original Message----- > From: Patricia Gee-Best [mailto:Patricia.Gee-Best@Sun.COM] > Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 6:33 AM > To: Paul Prescod > Cc: framemaker-dita@yahoogroups.com; > dita-users@yahoogroups.com; dita@lists.oasis-open.org; > dita-ot-developer@lists.sourceforge.net; > dita-ot-user@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [dita] FrameMaker as DITA Publishing Engine > > Hi, Paul: > > Thanks very much for this information. I have one question, > where I think you have some information below reversed: > > * inline elements -> paragraph styles > > Shouldn't this be "character styles" instead? > > > * paragraph elements -> character styles > > Shouldn't this be "paragraph styles" instead? > > > Thanks! > > Pat Gee Best > Sun Microsystems, Inc. > Austin, Texas > > > > > >Most follow-up discussion of this issue should happen on the > >dita-ot-developer list. > > > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dita-ot-developer > > > >Goals > >===== > > > >FrameMaker is a capable, relatively cheap, widely deployed > formatting > >engine. It is, of course, also an authoring application, but > there is a > >separate project designed to make it usable as a DITA editor.[1] We > >think that we can make more substantial progress in a much > shorter time > >treating FrameMaker as a publishing output and have already > >demonstrated this with a Proof of Concept demonstrated > during a Blast > >Radius XMetaL Webinar[2]. There are some loose ends to tie > up, but the > >overall technique is proven. > > > >[1] http://groups.yahoo.com/group/framemaker-dita/ > >[2] http://tinyurl.com/7voye > > > >The following DITA constructs should be mapped to appropriate > >FrameMaker > >constructs: > > > > * inline elements -> paragraph styles > > > > * paragraph elements -> character styles > > > > * topic and section titles -> heading styles > > > > * topicref titles -> heading styles (optional) > > > > * CALS tables -> FM tables > > > > * various kinds of simple tables -> FM tables > > > > * DITA internal cross references -> FrameMaker cross references > > > > * DITA external cross references -> FrameMaker hyperlinks > > > > * DITA index entries -> FrameMaker index entries > > > > * DITA footnotes -> FrameMaker footnotes > > > > * DITA graphics -> FrameMaker graphics > > > > * xxx anything else? xxx > > > >The following DITA constructs should be normalized by the > DITA toolkit: > > * conref processing > > * topic merging > > * defaulted attributes > > * generalization > > * DITA address resolution > > > >Whereever possible, the overall rules about how maps, topic > references, > >related links, cross references etc. are interpreted should > be shared > >between the XSL-FO and FrameMaker outputs. They will use a > single topic > >merging algorithm likely implemented in common code (topicmerge.xsl). > > > >There are some aspects that could arguably be handled in > either place. > >There is still room for discussion on where to handle these: > > > > * table of contents generation > > > > * index generation (not index authoring, but generation from index > >markers) > > > >High-level architecture > >======================= > >FrameMaker will be integrated into the DITA toolkit as an Ant target. > >Consider the flowchart here[1]. After "topic merge" there > will be a new > >branch. Instead of "transform to xsl-fo", the new branch will say > >"transform to FrameMaker-friendly DITA". This will be done > through an > >XSLT that transform to a proprietary variant of DITA. This > variant is > >designed to work around limitations of FrameMaker (e.g. cross > >references and tables). This proprietary format will also be a > >generalized form of DITA with a fixed set of element types > (FrameMaker > >requires EDDs to list all element types). Specialization information > >will be moved into attribute values so that they can be > acted on in the > >EDD. An very complete EDD, read-write rules file and FrameMaker > >template will be provided and can be customized by customers. The > >solution should not require any FrameMaker plugins and should be > >compatible with all 7.x versions of FrameMaker. > > > >[1] > >http://dita-ot.sourceforge.net/SourceForgeFiles/doc/DITA-OTAr > chitecture. > >html > > > >Customization hooks > >=================== > > > >The simplest way to customize the solution is just to change the > >template in FrameMaker. Replace the master pages, the > character styles, > >paragraph styles etc. Alternately, more substantial changes > can be done > >by tweaking the EDD or read/write rules. You should also use > EDD tweaks > >if you want to use an existing template and style names with the > >solution. FrameMaker's complicated configuration > architecture cannot be > >simplified within the scope of this project. > > > >Limitations > >=========== > >Due to limitations of FrameMaker, it is probably not possible to use > >the "outputclass" attribute to directly address character, > paragraph, > >table or cross reference styles. It will always be necessary to edit > >the EDD to recognize the outputclass attribute and map it to a style. > > > >FrameMaker cannot handle nested tables. > > > >Other limitations will be documented as they arise. > > > > Paul Prescod > > > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]