OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

dita message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [dita] Updated feature 20

Yes, I agree with the XSL (not XSLT) reference.
CSS3 is not yet a Recommendation, and interoperable support is
only guaranteed for those referenced by XSL and the HTML DTD.

From: Michael Priestley [mailto:mpriestl@ca.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, 2006 May 22 22:37
To: Paul Prescod
Cc: dita@lists.oasis-open.org; Esrig, Bruce (Bruce); Paul Prescod; Robert D Anderson; Su-Laine Yeo
Subject: [dita] Updated feature 20

> We proposed to take out the list of colour names in the
> specification. They could be included by reference as suggested by
> Paul Grosso.
> On the other hand, the link to the XSLT specification implies that
> DITAVAL processors should support the syntaxes defined here:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/slice5.html#expr-color-functions
> We should be explicit about what syntaxes we support. I personally
> would like to know whether XSL will synchronize with SVG and CSS as
> defined here:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-color/#svg-color
> Somehow we need a clear definition of what syntax the attribute
> supports. It doesn't matter much what the syntax is.

I don't have a decision here. In the absence of input, I am picking the existing XSLT reference because the list of colors is shorter. 

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]