[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] Prototype DITA 1.1 DTDs
I realize that bookmap hasn't been official until 1.1, but there have been big changes in that model from the demo. Content valid against one version will not against the other. So far, the biggest issue I've seen is with title, but there may be others. The different public identifiers would alleviate any concerns over compatibility, because you know what version you are validating against. DocBook's naming and versioning for v5.0 is documented here for those curious: http://www.docbook.org/docs/howto/#cust-naming Best regards, --Scott .Paul Prescod wrote: > To summarize: the reason you would like version-dependent public > identifiers is because you are nervous that DITA 1.1 will not be 100% > backwards compatible with DITA 1.0. Is that right? If it turned out to > be 100% backwards compatible then you would not mind installing DITA > 1.1 for your translators to use with DITA 1.0 and 1.1 documents. > > Paul Prescod > --
begin:vcard fn:Scott Hudson n:Hudson;Scott org:Flatirons Solutions adr:;;4747 Table Mesa Drive, Suite 200;Boulder;CO;80305;USA email;internet:scott.hudson@flatironssolutions.com title:Consultant tel;work:303-544-0514 x146 tel;fax:303-544-0522 tel;cell:303-332-1883 note:Knowledge is power. Sharing is empowerment. x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:http://shudson310.blogspot.com version:2.1 end:vcard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]