OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

dita message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: 1.2 Requirements Ranking


Top 5 critical:

12011 - I think the current task model is too specialized, precluding 
many useful other specializations of task.

12016 - This is a key functionality that would help make the use of DITA 
much easier and more natural

12047 - Maps are a key distinguisher for DITA and this proposal provides 
needed and natural refinements

12007 - Need an indirection mechanism of some sort. Also need a "logical 
name reference" mechanism. Keyref may or may not be one or the other of 
these but it stands as a placeholder for the requirements.

12010 - This seems like an important refinement to the specialization 
mechanism that needs to be done sooner rather than later.


Simple:

12001 - Implies no functional change to spec
12009 - Seems obvious and easy
12018 - Needed bug fix
12019 - Another non-controversial proposal
12022 - Obvious bug fix
12023 - Ditto
12024 - Easy
12028 - No functional change
12029 - Easy to implement, no functional change to existing docs
12035 - Requires a little design but should be non-controversial
12043 - Easy
12046 - Easy
12051 - Should be there already
12052 - Ditto

Issue that I didn't choose and why:

- 12008 - Potentially very complicated, not clear that it's needed, 
could be controversial
- 12013 - Workaround exists to satisfy requirement
- 12015 - Potentially complicated, at least in terms of clearly defining 
processing implications.
- 12020 - Can do this today with local specializations or just using 
<ph> element. Not required to meet stated requirements
- 12021 - I am now in agreement with Michael that section should not nest
- 12026 - Is there more that needs doing for glossary?
- 12030 - Namespace issues should be deferred to 2.0
- 12031 - Complex issue
- 12033 - Potentially complex issue. Could effect other aspects of 
specialization
- 12039-41 - Can be satisfied by vertical-specific specialization 
package. Does not need to be in core DITA spec.
- 12044 - Not clear what the value of this is if attribute has useful 
default.
- 12053 - Potentially complex or controversial feature

Everything else just fell between most important or easy but I have no 
particular objection to or enthusiasm for it.

Cheers,

Eliot
--
W. Eliot Kimber
Professional Services
Innodata Isogen
8500 N. Mopac, Suite 402
Austin, TX 78759
(214) 954-5198

ekimber@innodata-isogen.com
www.innodata-isogen.com



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]