[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] Clarification of <itemgroup>
Kimber, Eliot wrote: > I think that the description should be extended to include "p" in the > list that is currently "list item, definition, or parameter definition", > given that each of these is, logically, a specialization of paragraph > (even though they aren't necessarily literally specializations of <p>). Also, itemgroup doesn't allow itemgroup, which is something of a problem as well, since it means you can't implement this pattern: <wrapper> <content>{anything allowed as child of <p>}</content> <metadata>{specializations of <data></metadata> </wrapper> In that since <content> must be a specialization of <itemgroup>, there's nothing for <wrapper> to be a specialization of since nothing allowed within <p> allows <itemgroup>. So either itemgroup should be allowed to nest or we need another, more generic, wrapper base that <wrapper> in the above example could be a specialization of. Hmph. Cheers, Eliot -- W. Eliot Kimber Professional Services Innodata Isogen 8500 N. Mopac, Suite 402 Austin, TX 78759 (214) 954-5198 ekimber@innodata-isogen.com www.innodata-isogen.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]