[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita] FOR YOUR REVIEW AND APPROVAL: DITA Help Technologies Guide
I should rephrase my earlier comment: I can see this type of document as being valuable, but I am unconvinced that an OASIS committee should publish this kind of document. I've read the DHSC Statement of Purpose here: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=dita-help and I don't see how this draft guide fits. Su-Laine Su-Laine Yeo Interaction Design Specialist JustSystems Canada, Inc. Office: 778-327-6356 syeo@justsystems.com www.justsystems.com -----Original Message----- From: Su-Laine Yeo [mailto:su-laine.yeo@justsystems.com] Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 3:09 PM To: stan@modularwriting.com; dita@lists.oasis-open.org Cc: dita-help@lists.oasis-open.org; sdoherty@verivue.com; Tony Self Subject: RE: [dita] FOR YOUR REVIEW AND APPROVAL: DITA Help Technologies Guide Thanks Stan. I can see this type of document as being valuable, and I am glad the Help Subcommitee took the initiative. However, I question the value of having the DITA TC give their approval of this document. What is "approval" by the TC intended to convey to the public who reads the document? The TC members are not necessarily experts in the technologies described in this guide. Much of the factual information in the draft guide is impossible for individual DITA TC members to test and verify for themselves in a reasonable timeframe, as verification would depend on extensive experience with a very wide range of technologies, some of which are expensive and some of which have not yet been released. The guide also contains predictions along the lines of, "Such and such a group will be using technology x in the future", which we obviously also cannot verify. Another thing that "approval" could mean is that the TC considers the opinions expressed in the document, and the amount of emphasis given to various products, to be free of bias towards particular vendors. I am not at all convinced that this is true; the fact that some product-specific sections are written by people who work for the product vendor would indicate otherwise. It's great that you've given the TC the opportunity to review this document, however the word "approval" is problematic for me. Best regards, Su-Laine Su-Laine Yeo Interaction Design Specialist JustSystems Canada, Inc. Office: 778-327-6356 syeo@justsystems.com www.justsystems.com -----Original Message----- From: stan@modularwriting.com [mailto:stan@modularwriting.com] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 10:43 AM To: dita@lists.oasis-open.org Cc: dita-help@lists.oasis-open.org; sdoherty@verivue.com; Tony Self Subject: [dita] FOR YOUR REVIEW AND APPROVAL: DITA Help Technologies Guide Hi all -- The DITA Help Subcommittee submits for your review and approval Release 1.0 of our DITA Help Technologies Guide. We appreciate that members of the TC are swamped with DITA 1.2 specification work, but we hope that we could get your approval of this document in two weeks time (Tuesday, March 10). We plan to update this Guide every 3 - 4 months to keep it current. I have attached a PDF2 version of the document with Acrobat Reader commenting enabled. MS HTML Help and TOCJSBIS versions are available at: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dita-help/documents.php Check out the nifty OASIS-branded HTML that Tony Self (Help Subcommittee chair) has integrated with his WinANT tool. If someone with write privileges to the Adoption TC email list could forward this email and attachment, we would appreciate it. Thanx, Stan Doherty DITA Help Subcommittee, Secretary --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]