[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] Conformance and interoperability
On 7/6/09 6:26 PM, "Michael Priestley" <mpriestl@ca.ibm.com> wrote: > I'm not sure about the should vs must being a typo. I think it's currently > must, and on purpose. Doh! You're right--I was confusing the requirement to have documents with DTDs or schemas (should) with the design pattern (must). My apologies for any confusion. Too many hours spent reviewing/writing too many pages of this spec. Cheers, E. ---- Eliot Kimber | Senior Solutions Architect | Really Strategies, Inc. email: ekimber@reallysi.com <mailto:ekimber@reallysi.com> office: 610.631.6770 | cell: 512.554.9368 2570 Boulevard of the Generals | Suite 213 | Audubon, PA 19403 www.reallysi.com <http://www.reallysi.com> | http://blog.reallysi.com <http://blog.reallysi.com> | www.rsuitecms.com <http://www.rsuitecms.com>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]