OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

dita message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Order for lang ref files (Was "Re: [dita] problem with packagingof glossaries")

Obviously, the files are currently sorted alphabetically. Do you have an alternative that you would favor?



Michael Priestley wrote:
OF8717A807.2E55BDA2-ON85257619.0056A21F-85257619.00571583@ca.ibm.com" type="cite">
Some potential users of the base package:
- people creating tools that work with simple content applications with minimal structure, like unstructured blogs, news feeds, web page components...
- people who would otherwise not read the spec because it's too big, and can now be seduced into reading just the first part, which provides a context that makes the rest less intimidating

Re the organization below - I'm not sure about the order but the split looks right.

Thanks for making this discussion concrete.

Michael Priestley, Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
Lead IBM DITA Architect

Kristen James Eberlein <keberlein@pobox.com>

08/21/2009 10:33 AM

DITA TC <dita@lists.oasis-open.org>

Re: [dita] problem with packaging of glossaries

Two key issues:
1.        Who do we anticipate being the potential users of the base package?
2.        Michael, I want you to look at the current contents of the language reference material for both the base and technical content version. Is this as you have been envisioning it?



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]