Obviously, the files are currently sorted alphabetically. Do you have
an alternative that you would favor?
Best,
Kris
Michael Priestley wrote:
OF8717A807.2E55BDA2-ON85257619.0056A21F-85257619.00571583@ca.ibm.com"
type="cite">
Some potential users of the base
package:
- people creating tools that work
with
simple content applications with minimal structure, like unstructured
blogs,
news feeds, web page components...
- people who would otherwise not
read
the spec because it's too big, and can now be seduced into reading just
the first part, which provides a context that makes the rest less
intimidating
Re the organization below - I'm not
sure about the order but the split looks right.
Thanks for making this discussion
concrete.
Michael Priestley, Senior Technical
Staff Member (STSM)
Lead IBM DITA Architect
mpriestl@ca.ibm.com
http://dita.xml.org/blog/25
Two key issues:
1. Who
do we anticipate being the potential users of the base package?
2. Michael,
I want you to look at the current contents of the language reference
material
for both the base and technical content version. Is this as you have
been
envisioning it?
Best,
Kris
|