Re: [dita] syntax for domain usage declaration

[ekimber <ekimber@reallysi.com>]

On 9/24/09 3:21 PM, "Bruce Nevin (bnevin)" <bnevin@cisco.com> wrote:

> 
> But my question on reading this is, having declared pr-d, why would I
> want to still declare cpp-d? All the elements in cpp-d are already
> available as part of pr-d, aren't they? Is the ancestry of pr-d not
> recoverable from that of cpp-d?

The point is that you shouldn't have look into the cpp-d module to see what
it's ancestry is.

This rule is parallel to the rule for the @class attribute: minimize the
amount of looking about needed to determine the ancestry.

Cheers,

E.

----
Eliot Kimber | Senior Solutions Architect | Really Strategies, Inc.
email:  ekimber@reallysi.com <mailto:ekimber@reallysi.com>
office: 610.631.6770 | cell: 512.554.9368
2570 Boulevard of the Generals | Suite 213 | Audubon, PA 19403
www.reallysi.com <http://www.reallysi.com>  | http://blog.reallysi.com
<http://blog.reallysi.com> | www.rsuitecms.com <http://www.rsuitecms.com>