[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita] Conref terminology: Referencing element and referenced element
I think the resolution was that the TC requests that the
author group consider making the terminology unambiguous.
The proposed terminology (paraphrased):
This does not make it easier to explain conactions,
but the best we can do is make sure the terminology is unambiguous. For
example:
(BTW, Don said specifically that he was sensitive to making
resolutions that impact arch spec activities.)
-sp
--------------------------------------------
seth park
information architect
Freescale Semiconductor,
Inc.
512.895.2463
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]