RE: [dita] RE: Suggested schedule for DITA 1.2 specification -- feedback?

["Ogden, Jeff" <jogden@ptc.com>]

A lot will depend on the TC's ability to resolve a number of remaining
issues with enough time before the December 1st deadline to give the
writers a chance to make any changes that those decisions require.  That
probably means that the TC has to resolve everything at its Nov. 10th
and 17th calls.  That would leave the writers two weeks to finish their
work, but one of those weeks is Thanksgiving week here in the U.S.  And
remember that there are changes to the DTDs and XSDs that need to be
ready on more or less this same schedule.

And so, like others, I'm hopeful that the schedule that Kris outlined is
workable. I think the TC will need to work hard to get its end of things
done.  I think we should see where we stand toward the end of the TC
call on Nov. 10th and, if necessary, schedule extra calls and/or make
the call on the 17th two hours long.

   -Jeff

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gershon Joseph (gerjosep) [mailto:gerjosep@cisco.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 5:00 PM
> To: ekimber; Kristen James Eberlein; JoAnn Hackos; John Hunt; Park
> Seth-R01164; Robert Anderson
> Cc: dita
> Subject: [dita] RE: Suggested schedule for DITA 1.2 specification --
> feedback?
> 
> I also think this is workable.
> 
> 
> --
> Gershon
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ekimber [mailto:ekimber@reallysi.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 9:09 PM
> To: Kristen James Eberlein; Gershon Joseph (gerjosep); JoAnn Hackos;
> John Hunt; Park Seth-R01164; Robert Anderson
> Cc: dita
> Subject: Re: Suggested schedule for DITA 1.2 specification --
feedback?
> 
> I think the schedule is workable.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> E.
> 
> On 11/6/09 12:52 PM, "Kristen James Eberlein" <keberlein@pobox.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >
> > *Date
> > *  *Actual date
> > *  *New proposed date
> > *  *Work
> > *
> > 21 September 2009
> > 21 September 2009
> > NA
> > Second drafts complete; second internal review begins.
> > 4 October 2009
> > Waiting on review of technical content topics
> > 13 November
> > Review of second draft complete; authors begin working review
> comments.
> > 19 October 2009
> >
> > 1 December
> > Third drafts complete; third internal review begins. This review
will
> > include the OASIS DITA Adoption Committee and the OASIS Technical
> > Advisory Board.
> > 1 November 2009
> >
> > 22 December
> > Third review complete; author begin working review comments.
> > 16 November 2009
> >
> > 13 January
> > Final draft ready to submit to OASIS for public review and
> > official-approval process kick-off. This draft must include all
> > substantive content; if we need to add substantive content after the
> > public review begins, it will require us to restart the approval
> > process.**
> >
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Kris
> >
> >
> 
> ----
> Eliot Kimber | Senior Solutions Architect | Really Strategies, Inc.
> email:  ekimber@reallysi.com <mailto:ekimber@reallysi.com>
> office: 610.631.6770 | cell: 512.554.9368 2570 Boulevard of the
> Generals
> | Suite 213 | Audubon, PA 19403 www.reallysi.com
> <http://www.reallysi.com>  | http://blog.reallysi.com
> <http://blog.reallysi.com> | www.rsuitecms.com
> <http://www.rsuitecms.com>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php