[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] strict task vs. general task vs. the file naming andmodule rules
On 11/13/09 12:04 PM, "Bruce Nevin (bnevin)" <bnevin@cisco.com> wrote: > I, too, think it's best to take the backward-compatibility hit now with > as much education and explanation as possible to mitigate the effect on > existing users. And fix our due diligence processes so we don't get in > the same sort of trouble again. > > If we screw up, best to 'fess up and fix it rather than try to paper > over it. It's the only way to be absolutely sure to avoid unforeseen > consequences that might flow from the workarounds in option 2. I share this opinion as well. Cheers, E. -- Eliot Kimber Senior Solutions Architect "Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together" Main: 610.631.6770 www.reallysi.com www.rsuitecms.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]