acknowledgements [was: Minutes for DITA TC Meeting, 16 Feb 2010]

["Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Day [mailto:dond@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 2010 February 16 12:14
> To: DITA TC list
> Subject: [dita] Minutes for DITA TC Meeting, 16 Feb 2010
> 
> Agenda for 16 February 2010 DITA TC Meeting/Call

>        6. Acknowledgments in DITA 1.2 spec -- what should they
contain?
>           o
> http://www.oasis-
> open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dita/email/archives/201002/msg00033.html
>  (Eberlein, 9 February 2010)
> >Kristen summarized. Concerns are how to avoid leaving out anyone who
> has
> done a lot of work. Consensus: Criterion is that list must include
> those
> who have actively contributed as Members during 1.2
> development(proposals,
> authors, commenters, implementors of the DTDs and XSDs).
> >Action for Gershon to prepare this list.

There is a difference between editors of a spec and 
membership in the TC that develops a spec.

I suggest that what Gershon should prepare is a list
of "editors" (and he can interpret that as he wishes,
but I would tend to stick to authors of text and schemas,
not commentors and reviewers).

Then we have some section (I would not call it Acknowledg(e)ments)
that says something like:

 The DITA 1.2 specification is a product of the OASIS DITA
 Technical Committee.  The committee members at the time
 of publication were:

 [and then list all current members of the TC]

paul